- Last Money In - Newsletter on Venture Capital Syndicates
- Posts
- The Hardest Parts of Scaling a Syndicate
The Hardest Parts of Scaling a Syndicate
a newsletter about VC syndicates

Last Money in is Powered by Sydecar
Sydecar empowers syndicate leads to manage their investments more effectively. Organize, manage, and engage your investor network effortlessly with Sydecar’s management and communication tools. Their platform also automates banking, compliance, contracts, tax, and reporting, freeing up syndicate leads to focus on securing deals and strengthening investor relations. Elevate your syndicate operations with Sydecar.

The Hardest Parts of Scaling a Syndicate
Running a successful syndicate sounds deceptively simple: find great deals, rally investors, and repeat. However, the reality involves navigating complex operational challenges that often remain hidden until you're deep in the trenches i.e. Actively doing deals. As someone who's worked with numerous syndicate leads and angel investors, I've observed recurring pain points that separate those who can scale from those who struggle.
In this post, we’ll explore the four most difficult aspects of scaling a syndicate and how to address them effectively.
1. Finding Capital for Every Deal vs. Investing from a Fund
Unlike traditional VC funds with committed capital, syndicates must raise money deal-by-deal, creating a perpetual fundraising cycle. This approach presents unique challenges:
The Capital Treadmill
Each investment requires restarting the fundraising process from scratch. While funds enjoy the luxury of deploying committed capital (after they raised the fund) at their discretion, syndicate leads must convince their investors of each opportunity's merits independently. This creates constant pressure to not only source deals but also have the LP demand or buy-in.
Unpredictable Capital Availability
Market fluctuations, investor liquidity constraints, and competing opportunities can dramatically impact your ability to close a deal. You might identify an exceptional company only to find your investors tapped out from recent deployments or distracted by market volatility among other reasons.
Solution Approaches
Many successful syndicates often evolve toward hybrid models, maintaining their deal-by-deal structure while developing complementary vehicles that provide more stability - such as small funds for anchor investments or creating dedicated opportunity funds for specific theses where they've demonstrated expertise.
💸Last Money In Deals: We have made over 800 startup investments. Accredited investors & qualified purchasers within the LMI community can now gain access to our alternative investments such as venture, late-stage growth, and private equity through our deal flow sheet. Interested (it's completely free): Fill out this form.
👜Try Deal Sheet for Free: Want to join hundreds of subscribers in trying Deal Sheet, our premium newsletter that provides you access to the top venture deals with discounted carry. Try Deal Sheet for free for 7 days here.
🐦 Follow Us: Visit Alex’s Linkedin and Zach’s X account for constant updates Exclusive data from Sydecar, one of the industry's leading fund administrators, quantifies this transformation.
2. Constantly Growing Your LP Base
The syndicate growth paradox is real: you need more investors to do more and/or bigger deals, but growing those relationships becomes increasingly challenging.
The Never-Ending Recruitment Cycle
As deal flow increases, so does the need for more capital. This requires continuous investor outreach, education, and onboarding. Unlike fund managers who primarily fundraise during discrete periods, syndicate leads must perpetually attract new capital sources while nurturing existing relationships.
Calibrating Investor Expectations
Many new syndicate investors come with unrealistic expectations about returns, liquidity timelines, or investment frequency. Educating them about the realities of early-stage investing and how your syndicate operates becomes a crucial but time-consuming responsibility.
The Deployment Balance
One particularly tricky challenge is managing investor deployment rates. If LPs invest too much too quickly, they may experience "investor fatigue" when their capital is locked up without immediate returns. This can lead to churn and negative word-of-mouth just when you need their capital for future deals. In the long run this is definitely something you do not want your LPs to experience.
3. Thick Skin — Handling Investment Disappointments
Perhaps the most emotionally taxing aspect of running a syndicate is managing the relationship dynamics when fundraising efforts/LP commitments fall short.
The Founder Letdown
There's nothing more difficult than telling a founder you can't fulfill your investment commitment after expressing enthusiasm in their company. This will happen because without LP buy-in, there’s nothing you can do as a syndicate lead if you cannot get the capital. These conversations can be gut-wrenching, especially when you've built rapport and genuinely believe in their vision.These conversations can feel like a massive founder let down.
Preserving Relationships
The startup ecosystem thrives on relationships and reputation. Failed raises can damage your standing with founders, other investors, and the broader community if not handled with transparency and professionalism. This is an important note to always tell the founder you are running an SPV so they are aware of the process and not thinking you are investing capital out of a traditional fund.
Solution Approaches
Resilient syndicate leads develop frameworks for transparent communication throughout the fundraising process, setting clear expectations with founders about timelines and minimum & maximum thresholds. They also cultivate a mindset that recognizes market timing and investor preferences often overshadow deal quality.
In summary, you never really know where an SPV will land or if you will get the LP buy in to close the deal, therefore you need to plan accordingly for both founder and LP relationship management.
4. Handling Failed SPVs
When special purpose vehicles fail to close and/or underperform, syndicate leads face the complex task of managing disappointment across multiple stakeholders.
Communication Challenges (for Founders & Limited Partners)
Failed SPVs create parallel communication requirements: addressing investors who committed capital (i.e. had their time wasted), while also delivering disappointing news to founders counting who you told you were expected to participate in the round.
Administrative Headaches
Beyond the emotional challenges, failed SPVs often create administrative complications including unwinding legal structures, returning capital, and adjusting documentation. We work with 3rd party SPV admin platforms that actually take this on, however it is still important to act in a timely manner especially when it comes to returning LP capital.
Reputation Management
Each failed SPV creates ripple effects throughout your network. Investors question your deal selection and ability to close SPVs, founders hesitate to grant allocation, and peer investors may become reluctant to co-invest in future opportunities.
Solution Approaches
Experienced syndicate leads ideally mitigate these challenges by establishing clear minimum thresholds before formalizing commitments, maintaining transparent communication throughout the SPV fundraising process, and developing a light strategy on how to handle unsuccessful raises. Some also implement soft-circle processes to gauge interest before launching formal SPVs which can be directionally helpful before committing to a deal.
Conclusion
Scaling a syndicate requires much more than just finding great deals—it demands operational excellence, emotional resilience, and strategic communication skills. The most successful syndicate leads recognize these challenges and transform them into competitive advantages by adopting quickly, developing hybrid capital structures, implementing robust investor management systems, and cultivating strong founder relationships. Meanwhile, many others quickly discover that the relentless capital treadmill, constant relationship management, and emotional toll of failed raises make syndicate leadership unsustainable for them long-term. This natural selection process ultimately strengthens the syndicate ecosystem, leaving it populated by leads who have developed the infrastructure, mindset, and processes necessary to thrive amid the unique challenges of SPVs.
If you enjoyed this article, feel free to view our prior posts on adjacent topics
Last Money in is Powered by Sydecar
Sydecar empowers syndicate leads to manage their investments more effectively. Organize, manage, and engage your investor network effortlessly with Sydecar’s management and communication tools. Their platform also automates banking, compliance, contracts, tax, and reporting, freeing up syndicate leads to focus on securing deals and strengthening investor relations. Elevate your syndicate operations with Sydecar.

If you enjoyed this post, please share on LinkedIn, X (fka Twitter), Meta and elsewhere. It goes a long way to support us!
